EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia - FT中文网
登录×
电子邮件/用户名
密码
记住我
请输入邮箱和密码进行绑定操作:
请输入手机号码,通过短信验证(目前仅支持中国大陆地区的手机号):
请您阅读我们的用户注册协议隐私权保护政策,点击下方按钮即视为您接受。
FT商学院

EU’s oil ban: if market friction is low, so is the pain for Russia

The bloc’s agreed partial embargo may prove to be ineffective as higher prices could compensate for reduced volumes

The aim of economic warfare is to inflict maximum pain at minimum cost. Achieving that is hard when the target is a key commodity producer. The EU’s agreement to ban most Russian oil imports reflects justified outrage at the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. But it may prove to be ineffective.

The problem with oil is that it is traded internationally. Higher prices may compensate Russia for reduced volumes, as US Treasury secretary Janet Yellen argued in April. Equally, customers in the EU and outside it may swap sources of supply in response to price signals, with little ultimate impact on the Russian exchequer.

The lower the level of substitution, the more powerful the partial embargo. Some countries, for example, lack refineries that can process Urals, Russia’s sulphurous main export blend.

That is not a problem for China and India. They have already moved to fill the gap in demand for Russian oil created by self-sanctioning by European refiners and traders. India rarely bought Russian oil in the past. But it emerged as the largest purchaser of Russian Urals crude in April, according to S&P Global.

Asian countries may not take up the full slack in demand for Russian oil, however, fearing retaliatory western sanctions. Capital Economics thinks Russia’s oil exports will fall by a fifth this year, even allowing for a 15 per cent rise in exports to non-western countries. But after factoring in higher prices, the consultancy estimates that Russia’s oil export revenues will be $180bn, a mere $2bn lower than in 2021.

The gap between Brent and Urals crude — currently $31 — may eventually fall in response to substitution. One response from the west may be to ban its insurers from covering tankers carrying Russian oil. Creating friction of a logistical kind is one way of compensating for a lack of it in markets.

Even after the oil embargo is fully phased in next year, it may be more than offset by higher gas prices. The oil embargo reduces Europe’s financial complicity. It will not, by itself, sabotage the Russian war machine.

版权声明:本文版权归FT中文网所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

特朗普能源部长称美国页岩油在低油价下仍能继续开采

赖特声称,即使原油价格如政府所建议的那样跌至每桶50美元,该行业也可以提高产量。
13小时前

人工智能热潮引领美国风投狂飙至三年新高

投资者对快速发展的人工智能技术感到兴奋,今年出现了一轮大规模融资潮。

马克•卡尼能否赢得加拿大大选和与美国的贸易战?

这位前中央银行行长在经济方面资历深厚,但在政治上却未经考验。

欧元与美元平价是否已经不再可能?

许多投资者认为,特朗普终究将要兑现对欧洲的关税威胁。
16小时前

日本经济产业大臣赴美寻求关税豁免

随着钢铝关税逼近,以及特朗普公开质疑美日长期防务协议,日本经济产业大臣武藤容治周一前往美国,寻求提出“双赢”解决方案。

全球最大矿商削减勘探投资

尽管自2020年以来,在寻找对能源转型至关重要的金属方面的支出激增,但总投资仍有所下降。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×